Sunday, February 23, 2020

Florida Poly Tech and New College – The Classic Example of Academic Self-centeredness



Tampa Bay, Fl 
Opinion by: E. Eugene Webb PhD
Author: In Search of Robin, So You Want to Blog.
It did not take long for the academic claws to come out following the announcement of the Florida House bill HB 7087 from the House Education Committee to merge Florida Poly with the University of Florida and New College with Florida State.

For some detail check out this Article by Gary White in the Ledger: Florida Poly leaders oppose merger with University of Florida.
Florida Politics Jacob Ogles, The fight to save New College is on
Baypost Media 2020
If you have ever had any significant involvement with a college or university, public or private, you have probably had at least a glimpse of the political structure of these institutions. For infighting, backbiting and turf protecting it is difficult to beat an academic institution.
That was clearly on display as the presidents of both Florida Poly and New College quickly mounted full-frontal  attacks to protect their turf.
Florida Poly President Randy Avent rushed to Tallahassee to defend his turf, and likely his job. Donal O’Shea president of New College was not far behind.
This may not seem like much of a deal to you if you do not attend one of these colleges or have a child who does, but in the bigger picture, it points out a serious problem at the intersection of legislative over site and perceived academic self-value.
One of the major concerns is the amount of administrative cost.
Small colleges can be a wonderful place for the academic elite. Havens for those prefer the academic life in contrast to the hustle of a big university. Small, usually lovely campuses, smaller classes, and fewer of them, lots of time to sit and think, good pay, tenure, and at the top, social status and often lots of money.
The day of the small publicly funded college be it liberal arts or STEM where students can be coddled in the academic womb may be a thing of the past.
Rep. Randy Fine, the Palm Bay Republican leading the charge for the mergers, said, “it’s critical for other lawmakers to consider the plan.
You will hear a lot about the value these smaller colleges afford their students, the benefits, often undefined, to the community, seemingly massive economic impacts they have, but little about what really matters most to them, which is protecting their turf.
I’ll bet you thought it was the students who were important.
If that was the case, we would have had a solution to the student-loan problem long ago. All that borrowed money flowing into University system is what has caused this problem.
If you want to see how big, the Florida Poly problem is just note that large and rather odd-looking white structure off, I-4 near Lakeland. One of the first structures put in place at Florida Poly, it is testament to how these things get out of control.
To paraphrase: Hell, hath no fury like a small college president challenged.
The Florida Legislature and the House Education Committee may have just grabbed a tiger by the tail. The old adage goes if you hang on it will drag you to death, and if you let go it turn around and eat you alive.
I would not be surprised if the Florida Legislature decides to pass on this one this year.
E-mail Doc at mail to: dr.gwebb@yahoo.com or send me a Facebook (E. Eugene Webb) Friend request. Like or share on Facebook and follow me on TWITTER  @DOC ON THE BAY.
See Doc's Photo Gallery at 
Bay Post Photos.  
Disclosures:

Please comment below.



Friday, February 21, 2020

Thursday February 19, 2020 Democratic Debate Observations


Tampa Bay, Fl
Opinion by: E. Eugene Webb PhD
Author: In Search of Robin, So You Want to Blog
.
Some pundit commented right after the debate that it was more like Wrestle Mania than a political debate. I could not agree more.
First, the format was terrible. There were way too many members on the “panel” probably NBC’s attempt to prove they support everyone, but they really looked awful.
The poor guy from the Nevada Independent, Jon Ralston, barely got a shot. I’m not sure why he was there, and it looked like he didn’t know either. The on the dais NBC egos were on full display.
I don’t think these debates need a panel that whose numbers rival the number of candidates unless the idea is self-defense in case of a stage riot. The DNC calls it “diversity among the moderators," all they are really doing is allowing the networks to run in ringers.
This idea of having ethnic or “subject matter” questioners is just plain stupid. Also, whatever happened to just asking the question without a snarky tone in your voice? NBC needs to do some debate moderator counseling.
I am not sure why they say there are “rules” for these episodes of political theater. Nobody, including Lester Holt made any serious effort to reign in Warren.
For most of the night, Bloomberg looked like a deer caught in the headlights, Warren shrieked incessantly which some mistook for reinstatement of her “more aggressive campaign” I think she is just someone with little or no self-control and would be a disaster in the Whitehouse.
Sanders, obviously irritated that Bloomberg was even on the stage, hammered home his consistent talking points while painting Bloomberg as something just short of the Antichrist.
Buttigieg managed to stay calm in the storm. His bipolar description of the Bloomberg/Sander's views and the possible damage of nominating either was a sound point. Pete was the first to really get Amy Klobuchar off her game. It's been a long campaign, and it appeared to me, the workload and the stress are finally getting to Klobuchar. Klobuchar is good but not quite ready for prime time.
Biden finally got some legs under his campaign, but it is probably too little too late.
To sum it up, the format was lousy, the panel of moderators were generally terrible, Bloomberg should probably spend some of that money on a good debate coach, Warren needs to cut back of the coffee before the show, Sanders needs to smile more so socialism will seem a bit more friendly, Joe Biden is just Joe Biden, Buttigieg’s calmness is astounding at times, and Amy Klobuchar needs to take a few days off and just rest.
Everyone involved with putting on this debate from the DNC to top network brass should take a look at the results and begin to work on a format that is less a food fight and more of a delivery of issues and positions to the American public.
E-mail Doc at mail to: dr.gwebb@yahoo.com or send me a Facebook (E. Eugene Webb) Friend request. Like or share on Facebook and follow me on TWITTER  @DOC ON THE BAY.
See Doc's Photo Gallery at 
Bay Post Photos.  
Disclosures:

Please comment below.

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

PSTA’s Central Avenue BRT project loses out in federal funding process – again!


Tampa, Fl
From: Tampa Bay Guardian

Edited by: Tom Rask

Posted by TBG2016 on FEBRUARY 15, 2020

At PSTA’s Legislative Committee meeting on February 5th, PSTA’s federal lobbyist Harry Glenn spoke of a list that the FTA  has.  “It’s actually a list of projects…that kind of gives the Congress an expectation of what projects they [the FTA] expects to get funded in the next year,” Glenn said.

The FTA is the Federal Transit Administration. Glenn was responding to a question from Pinellas County comissioner Charlie Justice (full exchange here) about how so-called “Small Starts” projects like the Central Avenue BRT (CABRT) project are administered by the FTA.
Harry Glenn


Yet the CABRT project has now been on that “funded in the next year” list Glenn spoke of for three years without receiving a so-called construction grant agreement (CGA). Obtaining a CGA is the first and necessary step before being recommended for funding by the FTA.
And with yesterday afternoon’s release of the FTA’s “Annual Report on Funding Recommendations” for fiscal year 2021, it appears that this “funded in the next year” period Glenn spoke of will be at least four (4) years for the CABRT.

“Remember, this is the president’s request for funding, and Congress has appropriated more than that amount in the last couple of years,” Glenn told The Guardian. “PSTA is doing exactly what they should be doing.”

The Guardian previously reported on PSTA’s failure to secure a CGA last year as well, and the PSTA board’s unwillingness to acknowledge this fact at their meetings.

“This is not a competitively awarded program, where you will win and somebody else will lose,” Glenn said at that same February 5th meeting. ” You work through the process and as you check off the boxes, funding will become available to you.”

Glenn’s claim that the program is “not competitively awarded program” conflicts with PSTA CEO Brad Miller’s statement in that same meeting in which he called these projects “very, very competitive.”

The funds are awarded under the so-called 5309 program, which the FTA says is a discretionary program. That means there is no guarantee that a particular program will be funded, or that a program that receives a CGA will be funded.
Karen Jaroch

“It’s definitely a setback for PSTA that they still haven’t received a CGA,” former HART (Hillsborough Area Regional Transit) board member Karen Jaroch said.
Jaroch said that the CABRT project is one of many projects totaling approximately $1.6 billion competing for a pot of money less than half that size. Jaroch continued – “The FTA awards project funding only when PSTA can assure them that the project scope and costs are firm and reliable, that all local funding commitments are in place, and that all localities in the corridor are on-board.”

“Significant issues have been raised by PSTA’s grant submission, such as falsely claiming that St Pete Beach was a funding partner in the original application, the formal objection to the project by two of the three cities impacted by the project’s auto lane elimination and changing route endpoints. These facts don’t inspire sufficient confidence in the project, “Jaroch added. “Overcoming these facts will be difficult when compounded by PSTA’s past track record of abusing a federal grant meant for transit security and St. Pete Mayor Rick Kriseman’s unwelcoming comments about President Trump.”
ABOVE – Kriseman’s 2015 tweet



Jaroch was referring to Kriseman’s 2015 tweet (seen left)  in which he barred Donald Trump from entering the City of St. Petersburg. Most of the proposed CABRT will run within that city’s limits.

Obtaining a CGA doesn’t insure FTA funding. Some projects that obtained a CGA were never funded, and others , such as the Fort Lauderdale WAVE Streetcar, were cancelled by the City of Fort Lauderdale even after it obtained a CGA.

The FTA funded a St. Louis streetcar project that closed down in December after just one year of operation. The shutdown leaves local taxpayers on the hook to repay the FTA some 24 million dollars for construction costs. Adding insult the injury, the streetcar broke down on its final run, leaving riders to fend for themselves.

With such spectacular and recent PR disasters, the FTA is likely to look even closer at what projects it funds. The FTA is sure to want to avoid another “St. Louis Situation” at all costs.

 Absent a new funding source, i.e. more tax dollars, PSTA is headed for insolvency. Add the strong opposition from affected residents and municipalities and the CABRT project has a steep hill to climb.

“My understanding is that this is just a snapshot of where they are now,” Harry Glenn said, referring to the just published annual funding recommendations from the FTA. “There are additional funds available that can be allocated. When that will happen, I don’t know.”

Will the CABRT project ever be built? Or is it a project that is always a bridesmaid, but never a bride, at the wedding and spreading of federal funding?

As always….the Guardian reports and our readers decide. Like our Facebook page to find out when we publish articles.


READ THIS POST AT: Tampa Bay Guardian

This post is contributed by the Tampa Bay Guardian. The views expressed in this post are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher of Bay Post Internet or any publications, blogs or social media pages where it may appear.

Cross Posted with permission from: Tampa Bay Guardian





Sunday, February 16, 2020

Clearwater Asking the Age-Old Question is Climate Change and Sea-Level Rise Real?


I suspect that most of these people are descendants of those who made  fun of Noah while he was building the Ark, and we all know how that turned out.



Tampa Bay, Fl 
Opinion by: E. Eugene Webb PhD  
Author: In Search of Robin, So You Want to Blog.
You would think by now that we can all pretty much agree that Climate Change, and Sea-level rise are reasonable concerns. The notable exception to that statement is slowly shrinking number of politicians who just can’t seem to get their head’s around the fact the science about sea-level rise and climate change is real.
All of this leads me to an article in the Tampa Bay Times by Kirby Wilson and Tracey McMananus, Clearwater’s Rising Risk.
That leads me to two of Clearwater’s more noticeable Climate Change deniers City Council members Bob Cunduiff and Bud Elias. There are some notable quotes Wilson/McMananus article from both.
As there is an election in the offing in Clearwater, all candidates are postulating the normal solutions such as elimination of fossil fuels, using electric or natural gas-powered vehicles.
From the article, attorney Bruce Rector, a candidate for Clearwater Seat 2, said, “Whether man is causing it or not is not a question for a member of City Council, adding, It doesn’t matter why. There is pretty good evidence it is changing what are we going to do about it?”
Good point Mr. Rector. If I lived in Clearwater, you would have my vote.
It is time we started to elect some people with more pragmatic views of Climate-Change  impact and stop treating this major threat to our state as a political football.
You can  check out my recent Posts by clicking on Baypost Climate Change.
Here is the real point. If we started today converting all vehicles to eco friendly fuels, shout down all the coal-fired  electrical generation facilities in Florida or all in the US and implemented all of those other half crazy ideas you read about, the likelihood is it would not prevent the impending issue caused by a sea-level rise.
The real question is Bruce Rector’s question: “What are we going to do about it?”
Seawalls, dyke, dams and other physical barriers that the big construction and public works people are likely to propose will simply not work in the long run, think New Orleans. 
So, here is where the political will to deal with this problem becomes the issue.
It is time to stop all coastal developments in those endangered areas defined by sea-level rise projection at least in southern Florida and along the West Coast.
At risk, property must have a mitigation risk tax or fee assigned that is adopted immediately with those funds flowing into the funding for low lying property acquisition.
Laws need to be enacted that absolutely prevent this from becoming a Realtors and attorney's gold mine.
We need to increase the funding being set aside at the state level and begin to set aside funds at the County and local level for buying low lying property and converting it to green space to mitigate property loss and horrific increases in property insurance. And that means a Property mitigation tax on all Floridians to quickly build these funds.
Not much of a political platform to run on.
Time to get the political head out of the sand or it may be drowned when the unexpected tide comes in.
E-mail Doc at mail to: dr.gwebb@yahoo.com or send me a Facebook (E. Eugene Webb) Friend request. Like or share on Facebook and follow me on TWITTER  @DOC ON THE BAY.
See Doc's Photo Gallery at 
Bay Post Photos.  
Disclosures:

Please comment below.



Friday, February 14, 2020

Dems Best Bet – The Really Old, Really Rich White Guy - Bloomberg


Tampa Bay, Fl Opinion by: E. Eugene Webb PhD
Author:In Search of Robin, So You Want to Blog.


With things, really rolling along Michael Bloomberg (Mike) is starting to rear his head in the primary polls.
The Democratic Party is in near shambles as the candidates rip each other to shreds.
Sanders won the New Hampshire primary, though he splits the delegates with Pete Buttigieg.
It is starting to look like no one will win a majority of the pledged delegates to the Party convention leading to what is called a “contested or brokered convention."
Democratic delegates are pledged to certain candidates based on the results of primaries and caucuses. But they are not actually legally bound to vote for them, even on the first ballot. All of which could lead to a lot of wheeling and dealing even on the first ballot.
Conventional thinking goes like this. Sanders cannot beat Trump; Buttigieg cannot beat Trump.
Bloomberg may or may not be able to beat Trump, but with Mike as the presidential nominee, the Party could focus its financial support on down ballot candidates and possibly render a Trump victory useless because of complete control of Congress.
The other looming issue is what will Sanders do if he is denied the nomination?
Given Bernie’s age this is likely his last run as a socialist democrat on the national stage. He has no heir apparent.
Bernie has built an enormous coalition over the last few years, and I don’t think he is willing to let it all go for naught without giving his supporters a chance to vote for him for president.
Should Bloomberg get the Democratic nomination and Bernie runs as a third-party candidate, he will be running as much against Bloomberg as he is against Trump.
Trump wins.

The National Democratic Party could be facing a chaotic convention where the conflict between moderates, progressives and out right socialists plays out on the national stage with the media, both social and conventional, having a field day.
I am not sure Bloomberg is ready to deal with that problem, and I don’t see him as much of a party unifying force even with all the money.
Bloomberg is the logical choice at this point to challenge Trump, but the ensuing chaos and a possible fatal fractious split of the Democratic Party may not be worth it.
At this point, Bloomberg has pledged to support down ballot candidates, even if he does not win the Party’s nomination. If the Party steals it from him on a technicality, my guess is his pledge might soften.
Add to all of that President Trump’s ever presence Tweeting, and we could be in for quite a show.
For a good overview of the Democratic Party nomination process, check out the January 2020 article from FiveThirtyEight What are the Chances of a Brokered Convention by Nate Silver.
E-mail Doc at mail to: dr.gwebb@yahoo.com or send me a Facebook (E. Eugene Webb) Friend request. Like or share on Facebook and follow me on TWITTER  @DOC ON THE BAY.
See Doc's Photo Gallery at 
Bay Post Photos.  
Disclosures:

Please comment below.

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

Policy-violating transit chief fired by his board in policy-violating meeting


Should a public agency adhere to its own agency policies for meeting
notice? 

Tampa, Fl 
From: Tampa Bay Guardian
Edited by: Tom Rask

Posted by TBG2016 on FEBRUARY 8, 2020
At a special meeting yesterday, HART’s board of directors fired its $210,000 per year CEO Ben Limmer for violating several HART policies. The firing was “for cause,” meaning that Limmer will not get the severance pay his contract calls for.

However, that special meeting itself violated HART policy, which means that any official action taken at that meeting may be void. That includes the firing of Limmer.

HART is the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit authority.

The special meeting had been called four days earlier at the HART regular monthly board meeting on February 3rd. After receiving this investigative report about Limmer from the law firm of Carlton Fields the evening before, a 15-minute discussion ensued about when to consider the report.
Mariella Smith

Hillsborough county commisioner and HART board member Mariella Smith asked for more time to review the report. Ultimately,  and by a vote (video), the board itself set the special meeting for four days later.

However, HART’s own policy on meeting notices states the following:
Except in the case of an Emergency Meeting, HART shall give at least seven (7) days public notice of any public, regular, special or informational meeting, hearing or workshop.

The “at least seven days public notice” requirement was thus not met, and any actions taken at the special meeting may therefore be void.

If so, the board will have to meet, consider the issue anew, and fire Limmer again.

HART’s board chairman is Hillsborough county commissioner Les Miller, who chaired both the regular and special meetings. Hillsborough County commissioners Pat Kemp, Kimberly Overman and Mariella Smith, as well as Tampa mayor Jane Castor also sit on the board and attended both meetings. Eight other local politicians and political appointees sit on the HART board and had the opportunity to participate in the discussions at one or both of the two meetings.

Despite a 15-person board supposedly exercising oversight on behalf of the taxpayers, the board overlooked something: during all their pondering of Limmer’s policy violations, apparently not one board member bothered to consider whether the HART board itself was adhering to HART’s 393-page policy manual while firing Limmer.
David Smith 

David Smith (no relation to Mariella Smith), an attorney with the Gray Robinson law firm and HART’s long-time and highly paid general counsel, said the following during the discussion to set the special meeting (video):
The only question I have, not having the policies before me, and this board never having set a special meeting while I’ve been here, is whether you need to have a date certain when the board sets it.

Smith thus referenced those very HART board policies which the board then proceeded to violate in setting the special meeting. Smith clearly stated that a date certain was “the only question” he had about setting the meeting, not whether the required meeting notice was being given.

It is not clear if it is David Smith’s or chairman Les Miller’s responsibility to ensure that HART meetings comply with the policies that the very same board sets. Smith was busy last week, arguing a major case for HART before the Florida Supreme Court in Tallahassee on the Wednesday between the Monday and Friday HART meetings.

“My recollection was that it was an emergency meeting,” David Smith said when reached on a Saturday and provided the information in this article. An emergency meeting does not require seven days notice. However, all the evidence shows that it was in fact a special meeting and not an emergency meeting.

Most pottery, just like the HART CEO, has to be fired more than once.

Smith further said that he will be “checking the transcript” next week, but did not say whether a do-over meeting would be needed to fire Limmer once again. If they need to fire Limmer again, then Limmer would have something in common with most pottery in needing to be fired more than once.

Fired CEO Ben Limmer was not immediately available for comment.
Any person, not just Limmer, could seek to overturn the results of the special meeting in a court of law on the grounds that the statutorily required “reasonable notice” was not given for the special meeting.

Should a public agency adhere to its own agency policies for meeting notice? 

Especially when firing its CEO for not adhering to agency policies?

As always….the Guardian reports and our readers decide. Like our Facebook page to find out when we publish articles.



READ THIS POST AT: Tampa Bay Guardian

This post is contributed by the Tampa Bay Guardian. The views expressed in this post are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher of Bay Post Internet or any publications, blogs or social media pages where it may appear.
Cross Posted with permission from: Tampa Bay Guardian