Friday, August 21, 2015

PSTA CEO Brad Miller's Evaluation by PSTA Board Member Patricia Johnson



St. Petersburg, Fl
Opinion by: E. Eugene Webb PhD
Coauthor of: So You Want Blog

Each year PSTA Board Members are asked to complete a formal evaluation of the PSTA CEO Brad Miller. 

This Series gives the detailed evaluation by each PSTA Board Member.

Comment Text is taken from Documents obtained from formal Public Records Request with NO edits.

Instructions (To Board Members)
Please take a few minutes to provide a numerical score in the following 10 general performance areas. You may also provide narrative comments as needed. A narrative providing some further explanation of each performance area is provided to help guide you in developing your overall score.

Reviewer:  Patricia Johnson Vice-Mayor City of Pinellas Park

1. Organizational Leadership
Rating for this category is a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best).   SCORE:  2
COMMENTS:  I am shocked that the values of our leadership is to raise where we are supposed to be serving (Hand Written)

2. Future Opportunities & Investments
Rating for this category is a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best).   SCORE:   3

COMMENTS:  Why is he very aware of national trends The very heart of his job is to be aware of the needs of our population (Hand Written)

3. Policy Development & Strategy
Rating for this category is a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best).   SCORE:   2

COMMENTS:  He is developing policies that are very visible ,polices not the ones that are not "fun" -   (Hand Written)

4. Policy Implementation
Rating for this category is a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best).   SCORE:  3

COMMENTS: He communicates well but only within his predetermined goals – not pulling for overall needs of targeted ridership (Hand Written)

5. Working Relationship with the PSTA Board (As a Governing Body)
Rating for this category on a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best).   SCORE:  2

COMMENTS:  None

6. Working Relationship with Individual PSTA Board Members
Rating for this category is a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best).   SCORE:  2

COMMENTS:  No (Hand Written)

7. Financial Resource Management
Rating for this category is a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best).   SCORE:  3

COMMENTS:  While he tries to instill his process on the board members, he does not do so in a professional manner. (Hand Written)

8. Human Resource Management
Rating for this category on a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best).   SCORE:   3

COMMENTS: None

9. Community Leadership & Relations
Rating for this category is a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best).   SCORE:   2

COMMENTS: None

10. Project Management
Rating for this category is a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best).   SCORE:   2

COMMENTS:  None

E-mail Doc at mail to:dr.gwebb@yahoo.com or send me a Facebook (Gene Webb) Friend request. Please comment below, and be sure to share on Facebook. See Doc's Photo Gallery at Bay Post Photos.
Disclosures:
Contributor:
Waterfront Charter Amendment (Vote on The Pier), Carly Fiorina for President
submit to reddit

No comments:

Post a Comment